David: > This of 'static' SD values as class or interface constants. > Their value never changes and is the same for all instances > (or all endpoints implementing that service). It is just like > a static field in a java interface. I think the problem here > is a language one. I didn't like the choice of the word > static for just this reason. I would describe it as a > WSDL_Constant. The other values for mutability are constant > (set by the instance on creation), extendable (I can add more > but not remove them) and mutable (no holds barred). I agree that the word static is unhelpful. I also understand the need for constants in programming languages, but I don't immediately see the need in WSDL (or for that matter in any IDL). Can you suggest an example to clarify it in my mind? JimReceived on Thursday, 3 July 2003 11:27:18 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Friday, 25 March 2005 11:17:41 GMT