W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-desc-meps@w3.org > June 2003

Re: agenda for today's MEP call

From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 20:30:19 +0600
Message-ID: <0da501c334dc$fd068be0$72545ecb@lankabook2>
To: "David Booth" <dbooth@w3.org>, <public-ws-desc-meps@w3.org>

Out of curiosity- does the SOAP request-response MEP also
distinguish the cases as indicated below? If so I guess
we have to too. If not, if they can live with it why can't
we?

For example, to me a request-response MEP can be bound
to a same channel interaction or a multiple channel
interaction. Both are still the same MEP though.

Sanjiva.

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Booth" <dbooth@w3.org>
To: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>;
<public-ws-desc-meps@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 2:23 AM
Subject: Re: agenda for today's MEP call


> Sanjiva,
>
> The patterns we are discussing are merely variations on the same basic
> patterns that we have discussed for months.  We are discussing these
> variations in order to explicitly nail down subtle differences in the ways
> these patterns could be defined.  For example:
>          - whether or not a particular message transmission assumes
> conservation of messages
>
>          - whether or not the sender/receiver of a message is specified
(as
> a variable)
>          - whether or not the message communication is restricted to being
> "on the same channel".
>
> As the mpes-vs-iops[1] document states: "Inclusion in this list does not
> imply endorsement or recommendation by this task force or the working
group."
>
>
> 1.
>
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/meps-vs-iops/meps-vs
-iops_clean.htm
>
> At 09:18 PM 6/16/2003 +0600, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
> >More patterns?? So are we really going to have > 10 patterns?
> >IMHO this is going entirely in the wrong direction if we keep
> >adding more patterns. I supported the MEP concept but never
> >expected we'd be having 10 MEPs in the document.
> >
> >I'm sorry to say that I can't join this call tonite .. its a
> >bit late for me.
> >
> >Sanjiva.
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "David Booth" <dbooth@w3.org>
> >To: <public-ws-desc-meps@w3.org>
> >Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 9:08 PM
> >Subject: agenda for today's MEP call
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Agenda for today's MEP call (1:00-2:30pm EDT):
> > >
> > > A. New patterns from Amy?
> > >
> > > B. The pattern p2 family in meps-vs-iops[1]
> > >
> > >
> > > 1.
> > >
>
>http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/meps-vs-iops/meps-v
s
> >-iops_clean.htm
> > >
> > > --
> > > David Booth
> > > W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard
> > > Telephone: +1.617.253.1273
>
> --
> David Booth
> W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard
> Telephone: +1.617.253.1273
Received on Tuesday, 17 June 2003 10:30:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Friday, 25 March 2005 11:17:39 GMT