W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-desc-meps@w3.org > June 2003

Fwd: Agenda for teleconference 12:00noon EDT Wednesday

From: David Booth <dbooth@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 12:00:10 -0400
Message-Id: <>
To: public-ws-desc-meps@w3.org

Sorry, this accidentally went out to the wrong email address.

>Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 15:35:22 -0400
>To: public-ws-desc-meps-request@w3.org
>From: David Booth <dbooth@w3.org>
>Subject: Agenda for teleconference 12:00noon EDT Wednesday
>Agenda for tomorrow's teleconference:
>A. Amy's comments[3]. Is it helpful to have precise comparisons of 
>patterns and pattern styles first?  Or should we shift gears and start by 
>debating the strengths and weaknesses of PART2[2]?
>B. meps-vs-iops document[1] updates.  The latest update starts to model 
>the IOPs as using message transmission *without* conservation of 
>messages.  Is this helpful?  Are they worth including?  What about faults?
>C. meps-vs-iops document[1] updates: Sections on "Modeling Objective" and 
>"Modeling Notation".  Are these acceptable?
>1. meps-vs-iops: 
>2. PART2: 
>3. Amy's comments: 
>David Booth
>W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard
>Telephone: +1.617.253.1273

David Booth
W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard
Telephone: +1.617.253.1273
Received on Wednesday, 4 June 2003 12:00:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:45:44 UTC