W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-desc-eds@w3.org > May 2007

2002/ws/desc/wsdl20 wsdl20-rdf.html,1.44,1.45

From: Jacek Kopecky via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 16:19:31 +0000
To: public-ws-desc-eds@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1Hpo83-0005kQ-Av@lionel-hutz.w3.org>

Update of /sources/public/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv22078

Modified Files:
	wsdl20-rdf.html 
Log Message:
a few todos handled, deleted

Index: wsdl20-rdf.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-rdf.html,v
retrieving revision 1.44
retrieving revision 1.45
diff -C 2 -d -r1.44 -r1.45
*** wsdl20-rdf.html	20 May 2007 15:41:04 -0000	1.44
--- wsdl20-rdf.html	20 May 2007 16:19:28 -0000	1.45
***************
*** 46,70 ****
  </dl>
  
- <!-- todo  done, now respond
- The group has not defined who and what will implement this specification.
- 
- 294: agree with Karl, will add text that the RDF mapping maps from valid
- WSDL files to RDF graphs; the mapping can be implemented by generators
- of WSDL files which can at the same time generate the RDF form; or as
- plugins in Semantic Web applications, enabling them to understand WSDL
- data on the Web as RDF 
- 
- 296: will clarify what it means to implement the WSDL RDF mapping, but unsure
- about calling it a "Conformance" section
- -->
- 
- <!-- todo done, now respond
- 295: the RDF mapping document uses no capitalized RFC 2119 keywords, it
- only repeats (in lowercase) the restrictions from WSDL itself. However,
- I will try to reformulate things like "must" and "should" to clarify
- what is a new requirement from the RDF mapping spec and what is
- guaranteed (required) by WSDL
- -->
- 
  <p class="copyright">
  <a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/ipr-notice#Copyright">Copyright</a> © 2007 <a href="http://www.w3.org/"><acronym title="World Wide Web Consortium">W3C</acronym></a><sup>®</sup>
--- 46,49 ----
***************
*** 430,440 ****
  problems are pointed out in <a href="#diff-doc">section 4.2</a>.</p>
  
- <!-- todo done, now respond
- 293: agree with Karl that the text is unclear; clarify that the
- normative part of the RDF mapping do not consider the case where
- multiple WSDL documents are merged and that section 4.2 points out some
- problems 
- -->
- 
  <div class="mappingtable">
  <table cellpadding="4" width="100%" border="1">
--- 409,412 ----
Received on Sunday, 20 May 2007 16:19:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 20 May 2007 16:19:33 GMT