- From: Jacek Kopecky via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 15:56:41 +0000
- To: public-ws-desc-eds@w3.org
Update of /sources/public/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20 In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv11270 Modified Files: wsdl20-rdf.html Log Message: added section on component model limitations and restrictions not present in the ontology Index: wsdl20-rdf.html =================================================================== RCS file: /sources/public/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-rdf.html,v retrieving revision 1.15 retrieving revision 1.16 diff -C2 -d -r1.15 -r1.16 *** wsdl20-rdf.html 2 Feb 2006 15:25:57 -0000 1.15 --- wsdl20-rdf.html 2 Feb 2006 15:56:39 -0000 1.16 *************** *** 144,147 **** --- 144,149 ---- 3.3 <a href="#diff-references">Component references</a><br /> 3.4 <a href="#diff-propsasclasses">Representing properties with classes</a><br /> + 3.5 <a href="#diff-restrictions">WSDL restrictions not enforced by the + ontology</a><br /> </p> *************** *** 797,800 **** --- 799,824 ---- the property <code>offersFeature</code>.</p> + <h3 id="diff-restrictions">3.5 WSDL restrictions not enforced by the + ontology</h3> + + <p>As already mentioned, the validation-oriented WSDL specification and + especially its Z formalization capture a number of restrictions and + limitations that are not expressed in the RDF ontology. The following is a + sample listing of such restrictions and limitations:</p> + + <ul> + <li>In WSDL, an interface is always a different thing from a binding (even + if they have the same name), and they will stay different when mapped from + a WSDL file to RDF. In the ontology, however, one can assert that one + resource is both an interface and a binding and this introduces no + RDF-level inconsistency.</li> + <li>In WSDL, a Description cannot directly contain interface operations or + endpoints, for example; an endpoint is always in a service and interface + operations are always in interfaces. The ontology does not enforce these + restrictions so one can create an RDF file that will be consistent with the + ontology but will violate this restriction.</li> + <li>todo etc.</li> + </ul> + <!-- <h2 id="advantages">4. things enabled by rdf mapping - maybe move in</h2>
Received on Thursday, 2 February 2006 15:56:51 UTC