W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-desc-eds@w3.org > November 2005

Re: ParentId/ParentID in Part 1

From: Arthur Ryman <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 13:23:56 -0500
To: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>
Cc: public-ws-desc-eds@w3.org, public-ws-desc-eds-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF506F72AC.4E387063-ON852570C1.0063BC96-852570C1.00651099@ca.ibm.com>
Hugo,

Good catch. Thx.

However, the consistent spelling is ParentId, and I renamed it in Part 1. 
Here's why

ID is a type. Each component has an ID.

Id(x) is a mapping that gives the ID for the component x. Z Notation is 
case-sensitive so there is no conflict between ID and Id()

ParentId(x) is also a mapping. It gives the ID of the parent component for 
the nested component x.

Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division

blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca



Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org> 
Sent by: public-ws-desc-eds-request@w3.org
11/22/2005 05:31 AM

To
Arthur Ryman/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
cc
public-ws-desc-eds@w3.org
Subject
ParentId/ParentID in Part 1






Hi Arthur.

There were some inconsistencies in Part 1 about ParentId/ParentID.

I renamed them all ParentID.

Cheers,

Hugo

-- 
Hugo Haas - W3C
mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/



Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2005 18:24:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Tuesday, 22 November 2005 18:24:16 GMT