2002/ws/desc/wsdl20 wsdl20-bindings.xml,1.49,1.50

Update of /sources/public/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20
In directory homer:/tmp/cvs-serv4893

Modified Files:
	wsdl20-bindings.xml 
Log Message:
Issue 240: Included DaveO's text from
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Jul/0073.html


Index: wsdl20-bindings.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-bindings.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.49
retrieving revision 1.50
diff -C2 -d -r1.49 -r1.50
*** wsdl20-bindings.xml	20 Jul 2004 12:26:41 -0000	1.49
--- wsdl20-bindings.xml	20 Jul 2004 12:36:52 -0000	1.50
***************
*** 345,349 ****
            generated using the HTTP Binding's rules for generating a
            URI for HTTP GET (see <specref
!           ref="http-binding"/>).</p></item>
          </ulist>
  
--- 345,369 ----
            generated using the HTTP Binding's rules for generating a
            URI for HTTP GET (see <specref
!           ref="http-binding"/>). The input serialization format of
! 	    <code>x-www-form-urlencoded</code> is the only supported
! 	    serialization format for HTTP GET in the SOAP Response
! 	    Message Exchange Pattern.</p>
! 	    <ednote>
! 	      <edtext>Use of a different input serialization format
! 	      requires introduction of either a new MEP or a new
! 	      binding. The Working Group considered the limitations of
! 	      the <code>x-www-form-urlencoded</code> serialization
! 	      format (see <loc
! 	      href='http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Jul/0061.html'>points
! 	      #2 and #3 of Binding message content to URI
! 	      analysis</loc>). It decided that the limitations of the
! 	      serialization format, which could potentially be solved
! 	      by a serialization format extension, were not
! 	      sufficiently broad enough to warrant allowing
! 	      extensibility in input serialization for the
! 	      soap-response MEP. The Working Group solicits the
! 	      public's feedback on this decision.</edtext>
! 	    </ednote>
! 	  </item>
          </ulist>
  

Received on Tuesday, 20 July 2004 08:36:56 UTC