W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org > October 2007

RE: error in the WSDL primer

From: Gerd Wagner <wagnerg@tu-cottbus.de>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:19:03 +0200
To: "'Arthur Ryman'" <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
Cc: <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>, <public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org>
Message-ID: <001d01c80c09$4c0bf470$a2ca2b8d@informatik.tucottbus.de>
 



I don't think that's an error. You could have an endpoint that supported
both SOAP 1.1 and SOAP 1.2. The service could check the envelope to
determine which SOAP version was being used, and respond in that format. 

Yes, I understand, this would be possible. But is this the intended meaning?
That is, do endpoint addresses not have to be unique acording to the sepc?
 
Even if this would be the official WSDL definition, do you expect that WSDL
tools, such as Woden/Axis2 will allow this?
 
-Gerd 


I'd like to report an error in the WSDL example 
"Example 2-13. SOAP 1.2 and SOAP 1.1 Bindings"
of the WSDL primer
http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-wsdl20-primer-20070626

Both endpoints have the same address, which is
wrong (according to my understanding of endpoints).

Regards,
Gerd Wagner

--------------------------------------------
Professor Gerd Wagner 
http://oxygen.informatik.tu-cottbus.de/IT
Email: G.Wagner@tu-cottbus.de
Tel: (+49 355) 69 2397
Institute of Informatics
Brandenburg University of Technology 
at Cottbus, Germany
Received on Thursday, 11 October 2007 13:19:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:33 GMT