W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org > May 2006

Re: editorial: part 2, table b-1 incomplete?

From: Arthur Ryman <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 09:42:51 -0400
To: Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@deri.org>
Cc: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org, public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFC6A17C6B.A922BF06-ON85257168.004A7790-85257168.004B5809@ca.ibm.com>

I'll investigate this.

Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division

blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca

Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@deri.org> 
Sent by: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org
05/07/2006 05:37 PM


editorial: part 2, table b-1 incomplete?

Hi, it seems to me that table b-1 [1] in part 2 of WSDL 2.0 CR draft
lacks several of the {* default} properties in the lower part.

Those are {http transfer coding default}, {http query parameter
separator default}, {soap mep default} for Binding, and {http transfer
coding default} for Binding Operation.

I just stumbled upon that by chance, I haven't done a full completeness
check. 8-)

Received on Monday, 8 May 2006 13:43:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:05:58 UTC