W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org > August 2006

FW: Mentions of "error" and "fatal error" in Part 2

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:30:18 -0700
Message-ID: <37D0366A39A9044286B2783EB4C3C4E803D638F0@RED-MSG-10.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: <hugo@larve.net>
Cc: <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>

Thanks for your comment, and apologizes for reporting our resolution so
belatedly.  The WS Description Working Group tracked this issue as a
CR039 [1].

The Working Group agreed with the changes you made, this mail simply
fulfills our response requirements.

Unless you let us know otherwise by the end of September, we will assume
you agree with the resolution of this issue.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR039 

-----Original Message-----
From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Hugo Haas
Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 9:40 AM
To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject: Mentions of "error" and "fatal error" in Part 2

As per my action item:

?         2006-03-16: Hugo to check Part 2 for instances of the
                      terminology "fatal error". 

I looked at part 2, and have replaced those instances by MUST and MUST
NOT sentences.

I did it directly in the draft as it was simpler.

Here is the diff:

 
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-adjuncts.xml.diff?r1
=1.160&r2=1.161&f=h

And the final result:

 
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-adjuncts.
html?rev=1.132&content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8

Jonathan, I didn't find a CR issue associated to this. We probably
should have one, and have the WG approve the changes.

Regards,

Hugo

-- 
Hugo Haas - W3C
mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
Received on Wednesday, 30 August 2006 21:30:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:32 GMT