W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org > September 2005

RE: simple case of IRIs for Components in WSDL 2.0

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 15:24:31 -0500
To: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Cc: Arthur Ryman <ryman@ca.ibm.com>, Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>, "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>, public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <1126815871.32218.42.camel@dirk>

On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 10:41 -0700, Jonathan Marsh wrote:
> Yes, Dan˙s simple pointers point to XML elements rather than the
> description component,

No, I'm asking for a URI for the interface, not for an XML
element.

In my original message, I wrote:

| ...
| Then we should be able to use
| http://www.w3.org/2005/08/sparql-protocol-query#SparqlQuery
|
| to refer to that interface.

I suppose I could have been more clear; I don't mean some
indirect reference mechanism; I mean: to identifiy
that interface, directly.


>  per the XPointer spec if we keep compatible with it for our media
> type (and we should!).

I'm asking that the barename #xyz in wsdl isn't short for
the element with id xyz, but rather then component named xyz,
provided there's exactly one such component.

> 
> 
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Thursday, 15 September 2005 20:24:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:32 GMT