W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org > October 2005

RE: LC ISSUE from WSA: Clarify applicability of wsdx:Interface and wsdx:Binding

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 13:53:45 -0700
Message-ID: <37D0366A39A9044286B2783EB4C3C4E849E1BD@RED-MSG-10.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "David Hull" <dmh@tibco.com>, <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Cc: <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>

Thanks for your comment.  The WS Description Working Group tracked this
as a Last Call comment LC336 [1].  The Working Group agreed to fix the
problem by softening the language (your second proposal), plus adding an
explicit reference to WS-Addressing EPRs.

If we don't hear otherwise within two weeks, we will assume this
satisfies your concern.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/issues.html#LC336


> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-desc-
> comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of David Hull
> Sent: Monday, September 12, 2005 2:23 PM
> To: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org
> Subject: LC ISSUE from WSA: Clarify applicability of wsdx:Interface
> and wsdx:Binding
> 
> Section 3.3 contains statements about "schema components that use the
> xs:anyURI simple type".  Specifically mentioning this, and not
> mentioning any other type, raises some doubt as to whether these
> attributes may be used to annotate other types, particularly
> EndpointReferences of type wsa:EndpointReferenceType.  It would be
> clearer either to drop the reference to xs:anyURI specifically
> (leaving
> "schema components"), or to soften it to something more like "schema
> components, for example those that use the xs:anyURI simple type."
Received on Wednesday, 5 October 2005 20:54:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:32 GMT