W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org > October 2005

RE: SOAP and HTTP binding: definition of {soap fault code} and wsoap:code

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 13:35:25 -0700
Message-ID: <37D0366A39A9044286B2783EB4C3C4E849E160@RED-MSG-10.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Hugo Haas" <hugo@w3.org>
Cc: <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>

Thanks for your comment.  The WS Description Working Group tracked this as a Last Call comment LC319 [1].  The Working Group agreed to fix the problem by adopting the proposal at [2].

If we don't hear otherwise within two weeks, we will assume this satisfies your concern.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/issues.html#LC319
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0012.html

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-desc-
> comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Hugo Haas
> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 3:12 AM
> To: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org
> Subject: SOAP and HTTP binding: definition of {soap fault code} and
> wsoap:code
> 
> This is an issue which has already been addressed (LC130[1]) and
> editorially implemented incorrectly.
> 
> It therefore is editorial. Details follow.
> 
> Part 2's section 5.7 Binding Faults defines:
> 
>      * {soap fault code} OPTIONAL. A xs:QName, to the Binding Fault
>        component. The value of this property identifies a possible
> SOAP
>        fault for the operations in scope. If this property is empty,
> no
>        assertion is made about the value of the SOAP fault code.
> 
> [...]
> 
>      * wsoap:code OPTIONAL attribute information item
> 
>           * A [local name] of code
> 
>           * A [namespace name] of
> "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/wsdl/soap"
> 
>           * A type of union of xs:QName and xs:token where the allowed
> token
>             value is "#any"
> 
> [...]
> 
> 
> 
> 
>           Property                             Value
> 
> 
> 
> 
>                            The actual value of the code attribute
> 
>     {soap fault code}      information item if present and if its
> value  
>                            is not "#any"; otherwise empty.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Why do we need "#any" as a possible value if the wsoap:code attribute
> is optional?
> 
> It turns out that the resolution to LC130 was not properly
> implemented:
> 
> * Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com> [2005-06-04 01:08-0700]
> >   Issue LC130: Binding fault defaulting?
> >     RESOLUTION: wsoap:subcode and wsoap:code will be optional,
> >               wsoap:subcode and wsoap:code will allow #any as a
> token,
> >               missing attribute will map to #any in the component
> model,
> >               #any => no assertion is made about the value,
> >               http:code will be similarly modified.
> 
> -- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Jun/0003
> 
> wsoap:subcode, wsoap:code and whttp:code need to be revised to reflect
> the correct resolution of LC130.
> 
>   1. http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC130
> --
> Hugo Haas - W3C
> mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
Received on Wednesday, 5 October 2005 20:36:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:32 GMT