W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org > May 2005

RE: The description of wsdli:wsdlLocation attribute is limiting (Editorial Item)

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 15:44:17 -0700
Message-ID: <7DA77BF2392448449D094BCEF67569A507B4A302@RED-MSG-30.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Yalcinalp, Umit" <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com>
Cc: <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>
Thank you for your comment - we tracked this as a Last Call comment
LC129 [1].  The Working Group accepted the editor's resolution of this


If we don't hear otherwise within two weeks, we will assume this
satisfies your concern.


[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC129



From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Yalcinalp, Umit
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 12:38 PM
To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject: The description of wsdli:wsdlLocation attribute is limiting
(Editorial Item)


Dear All, 

I was reading the current draft of the WSDL 2.0 core spec. There seems
to be some disconnect in the current drafts. Check out what the
wsdli:wsdlLocation element definition says: 

The type of the wsdlLocation attribute information item is a list
xs:anyURI. Its actual value MUST be a list of pairs of URIs; where the
first URI of a pair, which MUST be an absolute URI as defined in [IETF
RFC 3986 <file:///\\l%20> ], indicates a WSDL 2.0 namespace name, and,
the second a hint as to the location of a WSDL 2.0 document defining
WSDL 2.0 components for that namespace name. The second URI of a pair
MAY be absolute or relative. 

I am under the impression that we were NOT going to limit the use of
this to WSDL 2.0 documents, and WSDL 2.0 components so that it can be
used for WSDL1.1 documents, in particular by WS-Addressing. 

It seems like an editorial item that did not get incorporated into the
spec which should be fixed. 



Received on Saturday, 28 May 2005 22:44:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:05:57 UTC