W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org > May 2005

Re: Comments

From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 13:54:41 -0400
Message-ID: <42975EE1.7020301@datapower.com>
To: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
CC: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org

>>[15] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC89j
> 
> 
> After discussing this for some time, it became apparent there are
> multiple ways to interpret this comment.  For instance, we don't see any
> improper use of namespaces.  Can you elaborate a bit more, and point out
> what you think the worst example is so we can focus on this issue more
> directly?

I will try.  It's been awhile and I've forgotten many details.

Consider the last few paragraphs of section 2.3.1.

I don't understand the "Note" paragraphs.  Are they simply saying to 
compare two QName's, you ahve to compare (namespace-uri,local-name) and 
tha you can't just compare "foo:bar" and "foo:bar" since foo might have 
different bindings?

If the answer is yes, then my response is "well, duh" and you don't have 
to say this every single time.

If the answer is no, and that more is meant, then either I don't 
understand you, which is most likely, or you're using QName's "wrong."

Hope this helps.

	/r$

-- 
Rich Salz, Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology                           http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway   http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
Received on Friday, 27 May 2005 17:50:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:31 GMT