W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org > May 2005

RE: Comments

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 08:52:48 -0700
Message-ID: <7DA77BF2392448449D094BCEF67569A507B49A78@RED-MSG-30.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Rich Salz" <rsalz@datapower.com>
Cc: <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>

> > 10. The numerous "Note"'s about name uniqueness are a big warning
> sign
> >     that something is wrong.  XML has the technology to avoid
> >     local-name conflicts, and the current scheme gives only the
> >     illusion of independent distributed service development.  Proper
> >     use of namespaces can completely obliterate this problem area.
> Tracked as LC89j [15], the WG has not reached a final disposition of
> this comment yet, though we expect one within about a week.
> [15] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC89j

After discussing this for some time, it became apparent there are
multiple ways to interpret this comment.  For instance, we don't see any
improper use of namespaces.  Can you elaborate a bit more, and point out
what you think the worst example is so we can focus on this issue more
Received on Friday, 27 May 2005 15:53:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:05:57 UTC