W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org > May 2005

RE: Clarify whether Parts 2 & 3 MUST be supported

From: David Booth <dbooth@hp.com>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 20:32:04 +0000
To: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Cc: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <1116351109.4250.9.camel@nc6000.w3.org>




Fine.  Thanks!


On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 13:20 -0700, Jonathan Marsh wrote:
> Thank you for the comment below, and for your patience with us in
> resolving it.  We tracked the comment below as Issue LC49 [1].  The WG
> agreed to reword 8.1 as follows: 
>   "An element information item whose namespaces name is "...wsdl" and
> whose local part id definitions conforms to this specification if it is
> a valid according to the XML schema for that element as defined by this
> specification (uri to schema) and additionally adheres to all the
> constraints contained in this specification family and conforms to the
> specifications of any extensions contained in it."
> + add conformance sections to each of the bindings.
> + 8.3, clarify that "this specification" means Part 1.
> + adding a note advising extension specification authors to have a clear
> statement of conformance.
> 
> The fix should be in the latest editor's draft at [2].
> 
> If you agree with our disposition of your comment, we'd like you to
> acknowledge it within two weeks; otherwise we will assume you are
> satisfied.  The WG plans to enter a second (short) Last Call period in
> the near future, and we invite you to review that publication as well.
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC49
> [2] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.html
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-desc-
> > comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of David Booth
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 1:53 PM
> > To: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org
> > Subject: Clarify whether Parts 2 & 3 MUST be supported
> > 
> > 
> > Part 1 Section 8.3[1] should clarify whether the Part 2 Predefined
> > Extensions and Part 3 Bindings must be supported by a conformant WSDL
> > processor.  Section 8.3 says that "a conformant WSDL processor MUST
> > accept any legal WSDL document as defined by this specification", but
> > it
> > isn't clear whether "this specification" refers to all of Parts 1, 2 &
> > 3
> > taken together, or only Part 1.
> > 
> > References
> > 1. http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-wsdl20-20040803/#processor
> > 
> > --
> > 
> > David Booth
> > W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard
> > 
-- 
David Booth <dbooth@hp.com>
Received on Monday, 23 May 2005 07:00:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:31 GMT