W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org > May 2005

RE: WSDL 2.0 Part3, Sec. 3.4

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 20:44:03 -0700
Message-ID: <7DA77BF2392448449D094BCEF67569A5079E99C6@RED-MSG-30.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Yves Lafon" <ylafon@w3.org>
Cc: <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>

Thank you for your comment - we tracked this as a Last Call comment LC110 [1].  The Working Group agreed to restrict the pattern to digits.digits, and add an explicit reference to 2616.

If we don't hear otherwise within two weeks, we will assume this satisfies your concern.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC110

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-desc-
> comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Yves Lafon
> Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 3:02 AM
> To: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org
> Subject: WSDL 2.0 Part3, Sec. 3.4
> 
> The XML Representation of the HTTP version used is a string
> representing
> only the "major" "." "minor", why not choosing the HTTP-Version
> definition
> of RFC2616?
> <<
>    HTTP-Version   = "HTTP" "/" 1*DIGIT "." 1*DIGIT^M
> >>
> Or use integers for major and minor?
> 
> --
> Yves Lafon - W3C
> "Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras."
Received on Saturday, 21 May 2005 03:44:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:31 GMT