W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org > May 2005

RE: Idle question

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 20:44:26 -0700
Message-ID: <7DA77BF2392448449D094BCEF67569A5079E99D3@RED-MSG-30.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Amelia A Lewis" <alewis@tibco.com>
Cc: <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>

Thank you for your comment - we tracked this as a Last Call comment LC74
[1].  The Working Group agreed to qualify our use of the term WSDL
document with "2.0" as appropriate to clarify that WSDL 2.0's import
works only on WSDL 2.0 documents, not WSDL 1.1 documents.  If we don't
hear otherwise within two weeks, we will assume this satisfies your
concern.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC74
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-wsdl20-20050510/#Description_details

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]
> On Behalf Of Amelia A Lewis
> Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 8:47 AM
> To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: Idle question
> 
> 
> Heylas,
> 
> So, can a WSDL 2.0 document import or include a WSDL 1.1 document?
> 
> Presumably, 1.1 cannot import 2.0.
> 
> Amy!
> --
> Amelia A. Lewis
> Senior Architect
> TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc.
> alewis@tibco.com
Received on Saturday, 21 May 2005 03:44:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:31 GMT