W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org > May 2005

RE: Misc Part1 editorial issues

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 20:43:58 -0700
Message-ID: <7DA77BF2392448449D094BCEF67569A5079E99BF@RED-MSG-30.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "David Booth" <dbooth@w3.org>
Cc: <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>

Thank you for your comment - we tracked this as a Last Call comment
LC119 [1].  The Working Group referred this to the editors for
incorporation.

If we don't hear otherwise within two weeks, we will assume this
satisfies your concern.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC119

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-desc-
> comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of David Booth
> Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 10:52 AM
> To: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org
> Subject: Misc Part1 editorial issues
> 
> 
> Misc Part1 editorial issues:
> 
> 1. Typos:
> s/modularize a a given component/modularize a given component/
> s/unless the are imported/unless they are imported/
> 
> 2. The mappings from the XML Infoset-->Component Properties are
> unidirectional in WSDL 2.0 -- not bidirectional.  (We do not define a
> mapping back from Component Properties-->XML Infoset.)  This should be
> clearer whenever these mappings are mentioned.  Therefore, phrases
> like
> (in sec 2.1.3):
> [[
> The mapping between the properties of the Description component (see
> 2.1.1 The Description Component) and the XML Representation of the
> description element information item . . . .
> ]]
> should be reworded to something like:
> [[
> The mapping from the XML Representation of the description element
> information item to the properties of the Description component (see
> 2.1.1 The Description Component) . . . .
> ]]
> 
> This occurs in a quite a number of places, and should be corrected
> throughout.  Here is another example:
> [[
> Table 2-1. Mapping between Description Component Properties and XML
> Representation
> ]]
> should be something like:
> [[
> Table 2-1. Mapping from XML Representation to Description Component
> Properties
> ]]
> 
> 3. In all of the Infoset-->Component Property mapping tables (such as
> Table 2-1), I suggest changing the column headings from "Property" and
> "Mapping" to something like "Property Name" and "Property Value
> (Mapping
> from Infoset)", in order to be more clearly descriptive.
> 
> 
> --
> 
> David Booth
> W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard
> 
Received on Saturday, 21 May 2005 03:44:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:31 GMT