W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org > May 2005

RE: Editorial Comment: wsdl:include

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 20:43:53 -0700
Message-ID: <7DA77BF2392448449D094BCEF67569A5079E99BA@RED-MSG-30.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Asir Vedamuthu" <asirv@webmethods.com>, "Edward Peters" <EPeters@webMethods.com>
Cc: <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>

Thank you for your comment - we tracked this as a Last Call comment
LC127 [1].  The Working Group referred this to the editors for
incorporation.

If we don't hear otherwise within two weeks, we will assume this
satisfies your concern.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC127

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]
> On Behalf Of Asir Vedamuthu
> Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 3:05 PM
> To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: Editorial Comment: wsdl:include
> 
> 
> Section 4.1 [1]
> 
> "The WSDL 2.0 include element information item allows for the
> separation of
> different components of a service definition, belonging to the same
> target
> namespace, into independent WSDL 2.0 documents which can be merged as
> needed."
> 
> As you know, include mechanism is not about merging documents.
> Suggestion:
> delete "which can be merged as needed".
> 
> [1]
> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.html?co
> ntent-
> type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#includes
> 
> PS: I believe that Roberto raised the same editorial issue in mid
> April.
> Couldn't find the mail URI tho.
> 
> Regards,
> Asir S Vedamuthu
> asirv at webmethods dot com
> http://www.webmethods.com/
Received on Saturday, 21 May 2005 03:44:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:31 GMT