- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 13:16:37 -0700
- To: "Roberto Chinnici" <Roberto.Chinnici@Sun.COM>
- Cc: <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>
Thank you for the comment below, and for your patience with us in resolving it. We tracked the comment below as Issue LC47 [1]. The WG agreed to add a reasonPhrase attribute as outlined in [2]. The fix should be in the latest editor's draft at [3]. If you agree with our disposition of your comment, we'd like you to acknowledge it within two weeks; otherwise we will assume you are satisfied. The WG plans to enter a second (short) Last Call period in the near future, and we invite you to review that publication as well. [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC47 [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Apr/0007.html [3] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-adjuncts. html > -----Original Message----- > From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] > On Behalf Of Roberto Chinnici > Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 1:18 PM > To: www-ws-desc@w3.org > Subject: Issue: describing the HTTP error text for faults > > > As discussed at the f2f, when binding a fault to the HTTP protocol, > we need to be able to specify the error text in addition to the HTTP > status code. The rationale is that the client may want to use > the error text to distinguish between faults with the same status > code. > > Roberto
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2005 20:16:52 UTC