W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org > March 2005

Re: a WSDL whatsit? (conformance terminology)

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:18:22 -0600
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Cc: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org, www-qa@w3.org
Message-Id: <1111526302.8271.686.camel@localhost>

On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 15:23 +0100, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> * Dan Connolly wrote:
> >p.p.s. I thought I saw a "define your terms" bit in SpecGL,
> >but I don't see it.
> 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-qaframe-spec-20041122/#define-terms-section

Ah... thanks.

And I see that my comment is redundant w.r.t. Dom's earlier comments
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/2004Aug/0000.html

to which the WSD WG replied...

"We agreed to add a definition of WSDL Document as a wsdl:definitions
element and its descendents."
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/2004Sep/0030.html


That seems pretty good. I look forward to a new draft so I can check
it in context.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 22 March 2005 21:18:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:31 GMT