W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org > February 2005

RE: Multiple input and output elements for an operation

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 11:36:15 -0800
Message-ID: <7DA77BF2392448449D094BCEF67569A5068A38DB@RED-MSG-30.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Zvi Bruckner" <zvi.b@sapiens.com>, <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>
The meaning of multiple inputs or outputs is defined by the Message
Exchange Pattern in use.  None of the MEPs in the Part 2 make use of
multiple inputs or outputs.  In effect, the schema allows them as an
extensibility point.

 

However, it might be a problem that only the primer says infault and
outfault define alternative fault messages.  That should probably be
fixed (or clarified if I just missed it) in Part 1 or Part 2.

 

________________________________

From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Zvi
Bruckner
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 5:39 AM
To: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org
Subject: Multiple input and output elements for an operation

 

The WSDL schema allowa multiple input, output, infault and outfault
within an operation.

The primer says that multiple infault and outfault define alternative
fault message.

It does not define the role of of multiple input/output. Are they also
regraded as alternative?

 

Regards,

Zvi Bruckner.
Received on Tuesday, 15 February 2005 19:36:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:31 GMT