W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org > April 2005

RE: Editorial: missing antecedent

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 16:22:03 -0700
Message-ID: <7DA77BF2392448449D094BCEF67569A507609CA8@RED-MSG-30.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Asir Vedamuthu" <asirv@webmethods.com>, <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>

Thank you for the comment below, and for your patience with us in
resolving it.  We tracked the comment below as Issue LC68 [1].  The
editors have addressed the editorial matters you highlight below in
their latest drafts [2].

If you agree with our disposition of your comment, we'd like you to
acknowledge it within two weeks; otherwise we will assume you are
satisfied.  The WG plans to enter a second (short) Last Call period in
the near future, and we invite you to review that publication as well.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC68
[2] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.html

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-desc-
> comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Asir Vedamuthu
> Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 5:59 AM
> To: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org
> Subject: Editorial: missing antecedent
> 
> 
> [On behalf of the XML Schema WG]
> 
> "XML Schema MAY be used as the schema language via import or
> embedding. Each
> method defines a different element information item for use within a
> types
> element information item." -
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-wsdl20-20040803/#xsd-types
> 
> The antecedent for the phrase 'each method' is missing. Also, what
> does it
> mean?
> 
> On behalf of the XML Schema WG,
> 
> Asir S Vedamuthu
> asirv at webmethods dot com
> http://www.webmethods.com/
Received on Friday, 29 April 2005 23:22:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:31 GMT