W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org > April 2005

RE: Part 2 editorial comment

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 16:16:37 -0700
Message-ID: <7DA77BF2392448449D094BCEF67569A507609C93@RED-MSG-30.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Hugo Haas" <hugo@w3.org>
Cc: <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>

Thank you for the comment below, and for your patience with us in
resolving it.  We tracked the comment below as Issue LC39 [1].  The
editors have addressed the editorial matters you highlight below in
their latest drafts [2].

If you agree with our disposition of your comment, we'd like you to
acknowledge it within two weeks; otherwise we will assume you are
satisfied.  The WG plans to enter a second (short) Last Call period in
the near future, and we invite you to review that publication as well.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC39
[2]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-adjuncts.
html

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-desc-
> comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Hugo Haas
> Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 9:01 AM
> To: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org
> Subject: Part 2 editorial comment
> 
> Section 3.2 says:
> 
>   This module is identified with the URI...
> 
> I would suggest s/module/SOAP module/ as this isn't any kind of module
> that is defined here, but a SOAP 1.2 module.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Hugo
> 
> --
> Hugo Haas - W3C
> mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
Received on Friday, 29 April 2005 23:16:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:31 GMT