W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org > August 2004

Re: QA Review on WSDL 2.0 Part 1, Editorial comments

From: David Booth <dbooth@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 10:47:55 -0400
To: Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Cc: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <1093358875.3121.7.camel@nc6000.w3.org>

On Thu, 2004-08-05 at 20:48, Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux wrote:
. . .
> - in 2.1.1 "Note that it is RECOMMENDED that the value of the
> targetNamespace attribute information item SHOULD be a dereferencible
> URI and that it resolve to a WSDL document which provides service
> description information for that namespace"; the "SHOULD" is not needed
> since the sentence is preceded by "RECOMMENDED"

Good point, but as a friendly amendment I think it might be clearer to
change it the other way around: drop the "it is RECOMMENDED that" and
leave the SHOULD.  (I wouldn't want the word "RECOMMENDED" to be
confused with W3C "Recommendation".)

David Booth
W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard
Received on Tuesday, 24 August 2004 14:47:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:30 GMT