W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-chor@w3.org > October 2006

RE: 'initiate' flag issue

From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 14:30:06 +0200 (MEST)
To: Martin Chapman <martin.chapman@oracle.com>
cc: "'Gary Brown'" <gary@pi4tech.com>, "'WS-Choreography List'" <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0610181422300.18209@gnenaghyn.vaevn.se>

On Tue, 17 Oct 2006, Martin Chapman wrote:

>
> I very much agree with the reuse argument to remove the flag; a choreo will
> be far more resusable if the flag doesn't exist, or at least add a
> don’t'care/maybe option!

I concur, In fact, the best, if this distinction is needed would be an 
initiate element somewhere (like on a description of the root choreo) 
with a link to the initiating interaction. But not something inside the 
choreo definition.

>
> Martin.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: public-ws-chor-request@w3.org
>> [mailto:public-ws-chor-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Gary Brown
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 9:04 PM
>> To: 'WS-Choreography List'
>> Subject: 'initiate' flag issue
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> Thanks to Yves, I have found Nick's comments on my original
>> proposal for
>> removing the initiate flag:
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor/2004Oct/0049.html
>>
>> Nick's argument focused on the declarative flag helping a
>> designer when
>> composing choreographies. However, I don't see this as being a
>> compelling argument - in fact, it is better from a reuse point of view
>> that previously standalone choreographies that initiated a
>> choreography
>> session are able to be composed into more comprehensive choreography
>> which now starts the session at a different point.
>>
>> Regards
>> Gary
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>

-- 
Yves Lafon - W3C
"Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras."
Received on Wednesday, 18 October 2006 12:30:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 December 2010 01:01:47 GMT