- From: Charlton Barreto <charlton_b@mac.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 20:29:41 -0800
- To: Martin Chapman <martin.chapman@oracle.com>
- Cc: "'Gary Brown'" <gary@pi4tech.com>, "'WS-Choreography List'" <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
Good catch, Martin. Beyond that, I support the change. -Charlton. -- charlton_b@mac.com +1.650.222.6507 m +1.415.692.5396 v On Monday, December 18, 2006, at 06:39PM, "Martin Chapman" <martin.chapman@oracle.com> wrote: > >Minor typo in 4th para proposal "...interactions MAY be cause a choreography..." >Otherwise looks good to me. > >Martin. > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: public-ws-chor-request@w3.org >>[mailto:public-ws-chor-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Gary Brown >>Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 5:25 PM >>To: WS-Choreography List >>Subject: Issue 3843 proposed changes >> >> >> >>Additional proposed changes for >> >> Issue: Redundant 'initiate' flag on interaction >> >>http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3843 >> >>Section 5.7 Choreography Lifeline >> >>3rd para: >>From >>"A choreography is initiated, establishing a collaboration when an >>interaction, explicitly marked as an /choreography initiator/, >>is performed" >> >>To >>"A choreography session is initiated, establishing a new collaboration >>between participants, upon the occurrence of the first interaction in >>the flow which beings at the root choreography." >> >> >>4th para: >>From >>"Two or more interactions MAY be marked as choreography initiators, >>indicating alternatives for establishing a collaboration" >>To >>"Two or more interactions MAY be cause a choreography session to be >>initiated, if they represent alternate flow paths from the root >>choreography." >> >>5th para: >>Delete >>"A choreography initiator interaction MAY be defined within a root >>choreography or within an enclosed choreography. In either case the >>collaboration is established when the first choreography initiator >>interaction is performed." >> >> >>This caters for all uses of the term "initiator" in the current >>specification. >> >>Regards >>Gary >> >> >> >> > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 19 December 2006 04:30:16 UTC