W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-chor@w3.org > September 2005

RE: Moving toward a review for CR

From: Charlton Barreto <cbarreto@adobe.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 07:27:22 -0700
Message-ID: <6FF1269B4144EB48BA3FA2B351404F0B0292E5@namail1.corp.adobe.com>
To: "Steve Ross-Talbot" <steve@pi4tech.com>, "WS Chor Editors \(E-mail\)" <member-ws-chor-editors@w3.org>
Cc: "WS-Choreography List" <public-ws-chor@w3.org>

I'll be happy to provide the diff document for the two. All I need is to have the HTML version (with work items 7 & 8 addressed from the Editors' TODO list from last week - all others have been completed as far as I can see from my review this weekend) for the CR document.  

-Charlton.
--
Charlton Barreto
P +1.408.536.4496
cbarreto@adobe.com
www.adobe.com




-----Original Message-----
From: member-ws-chor-editors-request@w3.org on behalf of Steve Ross-Talbot
Sent: Mon 2005-09-19 07:23
To: WS Chor Editors (E-mail)
Cc: 'WS-Choreography List'
Subject: Moving toward a review for CR
 

Chaps (Editors),

The time is fast approaching a review period prior to CR. In order to 
facilitate this review we (the chairs and the W3C contact person - 
Yves) are agreed that we need the following:

1. A url to a document (in html) that we can review
2. A url to the previous version reviewed back in August 
(http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/chor/5/07/snapshotCR.html)
3. A document listing the differences between the two

As soon as time permits could the editors facilitate this and provide 
the necessary bundle (of urls) to ensure a speedy and accurate review 
process can be accomplished in the shortest possible time.

My aim would be to move to CR tomorrow at the call and so this is what 
shall be reflected in tomorrows agenda.

Cheers

Steve T
Received on Monday, 19 September 2005 14:32:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 December 2010 01:01:41 GMT