W3C WS Choreography WG conference call Agenda 31st May 2005, 3PM EST, 12AM PST, 19h UTC, 21h BST, 22h MET, 1. Role Call ------------ 2. Confirm scribe ----------------- 3. Agenda Changes ----------------- 4. Approve minutes ------------------ 24th May http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-chor/2005May/att-0021/minutes_20050524_-_0.txt 5. Action item review --------------------- 1. ACTION: Martin to do UML diagram from scratch for CDL NO PROGRESS 2. ACTION: chairs to respond to issue raiser for closed issues STANDING ITEM 3. ACTION: Yves to define what is meant by correctness ONGOING 4. NEW ACTION: chairs to bring Tony's conformance proposal to the Choreo WG for discussion 5. ACTION: Steve and/or Martin to generate a list of the issue numbers that the editing team should be working on as a spot check. MC states that all editorial issues in bugzilla that are not resolved fixed need to be done. Nick: Asks chairs if we are still on track for end of month. MC: Depends on number of open issues. Need to check what is left and deal with what we know we have. 6. NEW ACTION: Greg to make sure all editorial issue that are in the current ed draft be marked resolved fixed in bugzilla 7. ACTION: Chairs discuss and provide a recommendation. ONGOING 8. NEW ACTION: Gary/Charlton to do example 9. NEW ACTION: Nick to do example 10. NEW ACTION: Nick to ask again on the public list to get a clear answer that enables implementors to deal with the issue. It needs to be a yes or no on the legality. So the semantics of the attributes need to be totally clear and unambiguous. 11. NEW ACTION: SRT to email Nigel W on use of group for fwd marketing. NOTE ON 8 and 9: Examples should be in WSDL1.1 and WSDL2.0 and should be same example http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor/2005May/0042.html 6. Proposals ------------ 1008 http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1008 Summary: FAULT HANDLING URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor-comments/2005Jan/0012.html Lastest thread: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor/2005May/0058.html PROPOSAL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor/2005May/0049.html REMAIN OPEN 1001 http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1001 Summary: CORRELATION OF CHANNEL INSTANCES URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor-comments/2005Jan/0006.html PROPOSAL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor/2005May/0016.html REMAIN OPEN 1003 http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1003 Summary: RELINGUISHING CONTROL OF PASSED OUTPUT CHANNELS URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor-comments/2005Jan/0007.html PROPOSAL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor/2005May/0005.html Latest thread: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor/2005May/0042.html REMAIN OPEN 1039 http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1039 Summary: Section 8 (Conformance) is incomplete LATEST PROPOSAL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor/2005May/att-0056/2005-05-23_Contribution_to_WS-Chor_on_Conformance_section.doc 7. Issues requiring clarification --------------------------------- Other issues: Why do we have so many places in which we declare relationships and roles? e.g. "participate relationhip", "channel types" 8. F2F Agenda and planning -------------------------- 9. AOB -------