- From: Gary Brown <gary@pi4tech.com>
- Date: Sun, 1 May 2005 18:57:25 +0100
- To: "Tony Fletcher" <tony_fletcher@btopenworld.com>, "'Steve Ross-Talbot'" <steve@pi4tech.com>, "'WS-Choreography List'" <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
What about the interaction's timeout element - the "fromRoleRecordReference" and "toRoleRecordReference". For minimal change, I guess this should be changed to "fromRoleTypeRecordRef" and "toRoleTypeRecordRef" ? (i.e. also changing the 'Reference' to 'Ref' inline with the 'typeRef'). Regards Gary ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tony Fletcher" <tony_fletcher@btopenworld.com> To: "'Steve Ross-Talbot'" <steve@pi4tech.com>; "'WS-Choreography List'" <public-ws-chor@w3.org> Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2005 5:10 AM Subject: RE: Roles in interaction > > Dear Steve, > > I agree that this change corresponds to the direction we have gone in so I > have made this change in the editors' draft. > > Best Regards Tony > A M Fletcher > Tel: +44 (0) 1473 729537 Mobile: +44 (0) 7801 948219 > tony.fletcher@choreology.com amfletcher@iee.org (also > tony_fletcher@btopenworld.com) > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: public-ws-chor-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-chor-request@w3.org] > On Behalf Of Steve Ross-Talbot > Sent: 29 April 2005 14:39 > To: 'WS-Choreography List' > Subject: Roles in interaction > > > > Roles in interaction. Should > > toRole > fromRole > > become > > toRoleTypeRef > fromRoleTypeRef > > ? > > Cheers > > Steve T > > > > > >
Received on Sunday, 1 May 2005 17:57:46 UTC