W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-chor@w3.org > March 2005

A question about the name prefixes in section 2.3.3 of the CDL specification

From: Tony Fletcher <tony_fletcher@btopenworld.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 21:40:54 -0000
To: <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000701c52c03$29ded2c0$6501a8c0@corp.choreology.com>
Dear Colleagues,
 
 
  An editing question: in section 2.3.3 

<roleType name="Buyer">

   . . .

</roleType>

<roleType name="SellerForBuyer">

    <behavior name="sellerForBuyer" interface="rns:sellerForBuyerPT"/>

</roleType>

<roleType name="SellerForShipper">

    <behavior name="sellerForShipper" interface="rns:sellerForShipperPT"/>

</roleType>

<roleType name="Shipper">

   . . .

</roleType>

<relationshipType name="Buyer-Seller">

    <role type="tns:Buyer" />

    <role type="tns:SellerForBuyer" />

</relationshipType>

<relationshipType name="Seller-Shipper">

    <role type="tns:SellerForShipper" />

    <role type="tns:Shipper" />

</relationshipType>

 

<participantType name="Broker">

   <role type="tns:SellerForBuyer" />

   <role type="tns:SellerForShipper" />

</participantType>

 
should the two rns: name prefixes be tns: or are they deliberately
different?
 
 
Best Regards     Tony
A M Fletcher
 
Cohesions  (TM)
 
Business transaction management software for application coordination
www.choreology.com <http://www.choreology.com/> 
 
Choreology Ltd., 68 Lombard Street, London EC3V 9LJ     UK
Tel: +44 (0) 1473 729537   Mobile: +44 (0) 7801 948219
tony.fletcher@choreology.com     (Home: amfletcher@iee.org)
 
Received on Friday, 18 March 2005 21:41:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 December 2010 01:01:28 GMT