W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-chor@w3.org > November 2004

RE: Coordinated Choreographies Proposal 6 - Extending Choreographies

From: Haugen Robert <Robert.Haugen@choreology.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 03:02:11 -0000
Message-ID: <221369570DEDF346AE42821041345E89603CF0@imap.choreology.com>
To: "Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>
Cc: <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
Monica J. Martin wrote:
> In thinking about nested choreographies, you could have a 
> child derived 
> from a parent OR a child that is dependent on a parent but 
> not extended 
> from it.
> Can we address either case (Proposal 6 includes the former only).

Proposal 6 is only trying to address the former case,
which does not exist now in CDL.

I'm not sure what you mean by the latter:
the relationship of an inner choreography to an enclosing one,
or the relationship between one choreography
that performs another?
I think both do now exist in CDL,
and are essentially the same,
although proposal 4 puts a new wrinkle on both.

Choreology Anti virus scan completed
Received on Wednesday, 10 November 2004 03:02:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:01:06 UTC