W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-chor@w3.org > November 2004

Re: Proposed Text on Clocks

From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 20:17:21 +0100 (MET)
To: "Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>
cc: Martin Chapman <martin.chapman@oracle.com>, "'WS-Choreography List'" <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.61.0411092014510.3260@gnenaghyn.vaevn.se>
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, Monica J. Martin wrote:

>>> is off by one hour without being warned that using relative time on 
>>> participant is more reliable that assuming synchronized clocks (even on 
>>> second boundaries).
>>> 
> mm1: I would prefer we say that any more granularity is left either 
> unspecified or undefined. The more specifics we provide the more gap may be 
> assumed. Thanks.

Well, in this text, we just say that CDL doesn't define anything, and 
only define what may be assumed in some specific cases (but without anmy 
guarantee). If you have some text to clarify that even more...

-- 
Yves Lafon - W3C
"Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras."
Received on Tuesday, 9 November 2004 19:18:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 December 2010 01:01:10 GMT