Re: CDL Challenge from Monica J. Martin on 2004-07-19 (public-ws-chor@w3.org from July 2004)

From: Monica J. Martin <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 07:38:38 -0700
To: david.burdett@commerceone.com
Cc: opensource@toolsmiths.se, public-ws-chor@w3.org, steve@enigmatec.net, distobj@acm.org
Message-id: <40FBDCEE.1030804@sun.com>

david.burdett@commerceone.com wrote:

>Anders
>
>*If* we do decide to define signals, I think we should just define: a) its semantics, b) a standard message type and c) standard states to correspond with the receipt (or not) of of the signals. I don't think we should define a standard representation for the signals as this can vary.
>
>David
>  
>
mm1: You can reference the semantics and standard formats that already 
do exist, however. Thanks.

Received on Monday, 19 July 2004 10:39:12 UTC