Re: State Alignment and Standard Signals

MessageHi

Do you have an example of how the CDL would look in order to represent this state alignment (e.g. as you have described in your article), in such a manner that the interactions are protocol independent? Would you see a "state aligned" interaction only completing after the second (acceptance) signal in the BPSS case?

For example, 

    <interaction A->B />

would only be deemed to have completed once B had sent the acceptance message to A?

Curious to know how such a state alignment protocol could be modelled in CDL in an abstract manner that is decoupled from a particular binding........

Regards
Gary