W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-chor@w3.org > January 2004

RE: WS Choreography Deliverables

From: Burdett, David <david.burdett@commerceone.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 15:52:43 -0800
Message-ID: <99F57F955F3EEF4DABA7C88CFA7EB45A0CB99948@c1plenaexm04.commerceone.com>
To: 'Paul Denning' <pauld@mitre.org>, "WS Choreography (E-mail)" <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
Cc: "WS Chor Editors (E-mail)" <member-ws-chor-editors@w3.org>
Yes. That's about it. I actually think that Steve's recent explanation of
the difference between choreography and orchestration summed it up nicely.


-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Denning [mailto:pauld@mitre.org]
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 7:21 AM
To: WS Choreography (E-mail)
Cc: WS Chor Editors (E-mail)
Subject: Re: WS Choreography Deliverables

At 02:18 AM 2004-01-29, Burdett, David wrote:
>It also identifies one possible additional document that would describe 
>how to generate process language definitions (e.g. BPEL) for a role from a 
>Choreography Definition.

Would the primer talk about where BPEL fits in relation to WS-CDL.

Maybe this gets into methodology, but it sounds like business partners 
would get together and capture their discussion in WS-CDL.  Then each 
partner goes back and generates BPEL (skeleton) for their side of the 
interactions.   Then adds more meat to the BPEL such that they can feed it 
into a BPEL workflow engine.

Is that the gist of it?

Received on Friday, 30 January 2004 19:21:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:01:03 UTC