- From: Ugo Corda <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 11:27:59 -0800
- To: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>, "Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>
- Cc: "Farrukh Najmi" <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM>, "Burdett David" <david.burdett@commerceone.com>, "Andrew Berry" <andyb@whyanbeel.net>, "Steve Ross-Talbot" <steve@enigmatec.net>, "WS Choreography" <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
I would have thought that an ebXML Registry client would subscribe to the Registry itself (seen as a Web service) in order to get notifications on events related to the contents you describe. Is that not so? Thank you, Ugo > -----Original Message----- > From: Chiusano Joseph [mailto:chiusano_joseph@bah.com] > Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 11:02 AM > To: Monica J. Martin > Cc: Ugo Corda; Farrukh Najmi; Burdett David; Andrew Berry; > Steve Ross-Talbot; WS Choreography > Subject: Re: WSDL and pub/sub > > > It would also be highly unlikely that the ebXML Registry > adopt WS-Eventing or WS-Notification from the standpoint of > their main mission. The event notification feature of the > registry is based on registry contents (subscriptions to > RegistryObjects, etc.) rather than subscriptions to Web > Services themselves. > > Kind Regards, > Joe Chiusano > Member, ebXML Registry TC > > "Monica J. Martin" wrote: > > > > >Corda: Farrukh, > > > > > >Do you guys have any plan of adopting one of the emerging pub/sub > > >specs, i.e. WS-Eventing or WS-Notification? > > > > > >Thank you, > > >Ugo > > > > > > > > mm1: I believe someone on this list has already questioned the > > implications of any open standards' body adopting proprietary > > specifications. >
Received on Monday, 16 February 2004 14:28:00 UTC