W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-chor@w3.org > February 2004

RE: WSDL and pub/sub

From: Ugo Corda <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 11:27:59 -0800
Message-ID: <EDDE2977F3D216428E903370E3EBDDC9039589CE@MAIL01.stc.com>
To: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>, "Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>
Cc: "Farrukh Najmi" <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM>, "Burdett David" <david.burdett@commerceone.com>, "Andrew Berry" <andyb@whyanbeel.net>, "Steve Ross-Talbot" <steve@enigmatec.net>, "WS Choreography" <public-ws-chor@w3.org>

I would have thought that an ebXML Registry client would subscribe to
the Registry itself (seen as a Web service) in order to get
notifications on events related to the contents you describe. Is that
not so?

Thank you,
Ugo

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chiusano Joseph [mailto:chiusano_joseph@bah.com] 
> Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 11:02 AM
> To: Monica J. Martin
> Cc: Ugo Corda; Farrukh Najmi; Burdett David; Andrew Berry; 
> Steve Ross-Talbot; WS Choreography
> Subject: Re: WSDL and pub/sub
> 
> 
> It would also be highly unlikely that the ebXML Registry 
> adopt WS-Eventing or WS-Notification from the standpoint of 
> their main mission. The event notification feature of the 
> registry is based on registry contents (subscriptions to 
> RegistryObjects, etc.) rather than subscriptions to Web 
> Services themselves.
> 
> Kind Regards,
> Joe Chiusano
> Member, ebXML Registry TC
> 
> "Monica J. Martin" wrote:
> > 
> > >Corda: Farrukh,
> > >
> > >Do you guys have any plan of adopting one of the emerging pub/sub 
> > >specs, i.e. WS-Eventing or WS-Notification?
> > >
> > >Thank you,
> > >Ugo
> > >
> > >
> > mm1: I believe someone on this list has already questioned the 
> > implications of any open standards' body adopting proprietary 
> > specifications.
> 
Received on Monday, 16 February 2004 14:28:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 December 2010 01:00:51 GMT