Dear Colleagues,
Please find attached a minor update to my previous proposal - included
comment from Gary at the end as a reminder. If the W3C format we should use
is the same as for the spec I will volunteer to put in that form. If
different I will volunteer the same service if someone can send me the new
(Word) template.
I agree with Gary's suggestion made in an email today that we build the
Primer around a running example and let that influence the order in which we
introduce items (we will need to build a good index so that folk can easily
find information on a particular topic). I suggest that we go with my
outline up to and including ' Overall structure of a description' and then
introduce the example and use it to drive the introduction of the various
elements. May mean that we do not need the section 'Putting it all together
- a worked example' or may be we alter that slightly and use it to give the
complete example having only given fragments up to that point.
Best Regards,
Tony
<http://www.choreology.com/>
Tony Fletcher
Technical Advisor
Choreology Ltd.
68, Lombard Street, London EC3V 9L J UK
Phone:
+44 (0) 1473 729537
Mobile:
+44 (0) 7801 948219
Fax:
+44 (0) 870 7390077
Web:
<http://www.choreology.com/> www.choreology.com
CohesionsT
Business transaction management software for application coordination
Work: tony.fletcher@choreology.com
Home: amfletcher@iee.org
