W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-chor@w3.org > December 2004

Re: ws-chor 12/8/2004: My Comments through 2.5.2

From: Haugen Robert <Robert.Haugen@choreology.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 20:07:22 -0000
Message-ID: <221369570DEDF346AE42821041345E89603D56@imap.choreology.com>
To: <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
Mostly written by Monica Martin, but agreed to by Bob Haugen (author of
the original sentence) here is a clearer replacement for a confusing
sentence on page 37:

Change from: "One "undo" Finalizer Block along with a "close" Finalizer
Block to signal
that the "undo" Finalizer Block is no longer able to be enabled, that
is, the
Choreography is now closed."

Change to: 
One "undo" Finalizer Block and one "close" Finalizer Block. If the
"close" Finalizer is enabled, then the Choreography will be closed, and
the "undo" Finalizer Block can no longer be enabled.

(Monica, is that ok?)


Choreology Anti virus scan completed
Received on Friday, 10 December 2004 20:07:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 December 2010 01:01:15 GMT