Fwd: A very brief summary of my view on the latest Editor's Draft on WS-CDL.

Thought you would all like to know that even Kohei thinks it's a good 
basis.

Cheers

Steve T

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Kohei Honda <kohei@dcs.qmul.ac.uk>
> Date: 10 December 2004 15:38:54 GMT
> To: Steve Ross-Talbot <steve@enigmatec.net>
> Cc: Nickolas Kavantzas <nickolas.kavantzas@oracle.com>, Gary Brown 
> <gary@enigmatec.net>, Nobuko Yoshida <yoshida@doc.ic.ac.uk>
> Subject: A very brief summary of my view on the latest Editor's Draft 
> on WS-CDL.
>
> Dear Steve,
>
> Gary noted we are moving to the last stage of discussions on CDL 1.0. 
> I summarise
> below my view on the CDL document which I could finally go through 
> last night.
> I believe the CDL 1.0 specification (as given in the latest draft) is 
> a significant,
> original technical contribution. In spite of the use of a natural 
> language,
> its narrrative in general is lucid, based on a strong grasp of the 
> details of
> the desired behaviour, made possible by collective examination by the 
> WG members.
>
> Some aspects may naturally need further elaborations during the last 
> call period.
> However. overall, I believe the current draft will give a good basis 
> for reaching
> the initial standard of this original process specification language.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> kohei