W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-chor@w3.org > December 2004

Comments on hopefully last draft of CDL this side of last call

From: Steve Ross-Talbot <steve@enigmatec.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 18:25:42 +0000
Message-Id: <BBF07F79-4A0F-11D9-823B-000393D13C9A@enigmatec.net>
To: WS-Choreography List <public-ws-chor@w3.org>

Section 1.4:

In addition, support for including and referencing service definitions 
given in WSDL 1.1 as constrained by WS-I Basic Profile [Action: add 
references] is a normative part of the WS-CDL specification.

No references given.

Section 1.5:
A Choreography Description Language is not an "executable business 
process description language" or an implementation language. The role 
of specifyingthe execution logic of an applicationwill be covered by 
these specifications [16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 23, 26].

Probably should change to:

A Choreography Description Language is not an "executable business 
process description language" or an implementation language. The role 
of specifyingthe execution logic of an applicationwill be covered by 
these [16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 23, 26] and other specifications.

Section 2:

Removal of the phrase "peer to peer" - why was this done? Didn't spot 
it before in the F2F document.

Section 2.3.4:
If the element passing is missing then this Channel Type MAY be used 
for exchanging information but MUST NOT be used for passing Channels of 
any Channel Type.

THANK YOU.
Received on Thursday, 9 December 2004 18:25:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 December 2010 01:01:15 GMT