W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-chor@w3.org > November 2003

Re: choreography & orchestration must be defined in a context

From: Monica J. Martin <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 10:27:05 -0700
To: Ugo Corda <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>
Cc: "Burdett, David" <david.burdett@commerceone.com>, Jean-Jacques Dubray <jeanjadu@Attachmate.com>, Steve Ross-Talbot <steve@enigmatec.net>, public-ws-chor@w3.org
Message-id: <3FC4E269.2060705@sun.com>

Ugo Corda wrote:

>Monica,
>So are you are saying that level 0 should be out of scope? I bet David might be able to derive the opposite conclusion ;-). 
>I suspect we should be much more explicit than that.
>
mm1: First is a semantic definition within the scope of WS-Choreography, 
particularly those described by David in Level 0? These seem to fall 
into the business category.  If we continue to expand the scope where 
does our boundary stop?
Received on Wednesday, 26 November 2003 12:20:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 December 2010 01:00:41 GMT