W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-chor@w3.org > May 2003

RE: Straw-man Proposal for our mission statement

From: Burdett, David <david.burdett@commerceone.com>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 15:57:56 -0700
Message-ID: <C1E0143CD365A445A4417083BF6F42CC053D1AB4@C1plenaexm07.commerceone.com>
To: "'Jean-Jacques Dubray'" <jjd@eigner.com>, Daniel_Austin@grainger.com
Cc: public-ws-chor@w3.org

I find myself agreeing with JJ again when he says ...

[JJ] yes, one of the value of the spec could be to offer a binding to
WSDL but remain open to other bindings.

I think this is an important principle if only because, as bindings evolve,
which they surely will to support security, reliability etc, then only our
binding will need to change, the main spec, hopefull, should not need to
change.

My $0.02c

David

-----Original Message-----
From: Jean-Jacques Dubray [mailto:jjd@eigner.com]
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2003 1:09 PM
To: Daniel_Austin@grainger.com; jjd@eigner.com
Cc: public-ws-chor@w3.org
Subject: RE: Straw-man Proposal for our mission statement




>>      I don't necessarily buy the argument that we are only talking
about
>>the interactions between one WSDL-ized object and another. WSDL is
just
>>one
>>way of doing things. Web Services should not be explicitly limited to
WSDL
>>interface, IMHO.

[JJ] yes, one of the value of the spec could be to offer a binding to
WSDL but remain open to other bindings.

JJ-
>>
>>
>>*************************************************
>>Dr. Daniel Austin
>>Sr. Technical Architect / Architecture Team Lead
>>daniel_austin@notes.grainger.com <----- Note change!
>>847 793 5044
>>Visit http://www.grainger.com
>>
>>"If I get a little money, I buy books. If there is anything left over,
I
>>buy clothing and food."
>>-Erasmus
>>
>>
>>
>>                      "Jean-Jacques
>>                      Dubray"                  To:
>><Daniel_Austin@grainger.com>, <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
>>                      <jjd@eigner.com>         cc:
>>                                               Subject:  RE: Straw-man
>>Proposal for our mission statement
>>                      05/09/2003 01:10
>>                      PM
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Daniel:
>>
>>We should be careful in using or not using the word "external". To be
>>this is an arbitrary distinction and the spec could remain neutral
with
>>respect to that attribute.
>>
>>There seem to be an important concept missing: "Long Running
>>Interactions"
>>
>>There also seem to miss some goals such as: being able to enforce
>>message sequences and detect exceptions, ...
>>
>>My two centimes (of Euro that is).
>>
>>JJ-
>>
>>>>
>>>><mission statement group = "ws-chor" type="CSF level 0">
>>>>The mission of the Web Services Choreography Working Group at W3C is
>>to
>>>>specify the means by    which Web Services may collaborate with
>>external
>>>>systems, specifically in the composition of multiple services and
the
>>>>sequencing of messages among them.
>>>></mission statement>
>>>>
>>>>Regards,
>>>>
>>>>D-
>>>>
>>>>*************************************************
>>>>Dr. Daniel Austin
>>>>Sr. Technical Architect / Architecture Team Lead
>>>>daniel_austin@notes.grainger.com <----- Note change!
>>>>847 793 5044
>>>>Visit http://www.grainger.com
>>>>
>>>>"If I get a little money, I buy books. If there is anything left
over,
>>I
>>>>buy clothing and food."
>>>>-Erasmus
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
Received on Monday, 12 May 2003 18:57:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 December 2010 01:00:17 GMT