Re: Straw-man Proposal for our mission statement

Daniel_Austin@grainger.com wrote:

>      I don't necessarily buy the argument that we are only talking about
>the interactions between one WSDL-ized object and another. WSDL is just one
>way of doing things. Web Services should not be explicitly limited to WSDL
>interface, IMHO.
>  
>
mm1: +1

>Regards,
>
>D-
>......................
>Daniel:
>
>We should be careful in using or not using the word "external". To be
>this is an arbitrary distinction and the spec could remain neutral with
>respect to that attribute.
>
>There seem to be an important concept missing: "Long Running
>Interactions"
>
>There also seem to miss some goals such as: being able to enforce
>message sequences and detect exceptions, ...
>
>My two centimes (of Euro that is).
>
>JJ-
>  
>
mm1: +1

>  
>
>
>  
>

Received on Monday, 12 May 2003 00:25:00 UTC