- From: Greg Ritzinger <GRitzinger@novell.com>
- Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 12:03:53 -0600
- To: <sambrosz@IPIPAN.Waw.PL>, <jdart@tibco.com>
- Cc: <Daniel_Austin@grainger.com>, <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
I agree, the mission statement's focus should be on services w/ a WSDL definition. rgds, Greg >>> "Jon Dart" <jdart@tibco.com> 5/9/2003 1:53:28 PM >>> I also find "external systems" confusing here. The assumption to date in this group, and also in WSCI and BPEL4WS, is that the services participating in choreography have a WSDL definition. If that is the case then choreography describes interaction among web services. If there's an external agent involved it is the clients of one or more web services .. whcih may be what Stanislaw is saying below. --Jon Stanislaw Ambroszkiewicz wrote: > > Daniel Austin wrote: > <mission statement group = "ws-chor" type="CSF level 0"> > The mission of the Web Services Choreography Working Group at W3C is to > specify the means by which Web Services may collaborate with external > systems, specifically in the composition of multiple services and the > sequencing of messages among them. > </mission statement> > > IMHO services are to be used by clients. > I wonder what is a service that "may collaborate", and what is the purpose > of that collaboration? > Since you exclude service interface, how a service > can collaborate with others services without knowing their types, i.e., > without knowing what they do? > > Best regards, > Stanislaw > > >
Received on Friday, 9 May 2003 14:04:31 UTC