W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-chor@w3.org > March 2003

Re: Abstract messages [Was: Multi-Party Binding Scenario]

From: Jon Dart <jdart@tibco.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 13:16:43 -0800
Message-ID: <3E836A3B.1010503@tibco.com>
To: Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com>
CC: "Patil Sanjaykumar" <sanjay.patil@iona.com>, "Burdett David" <david.burdett@commerceone.com>, Ricky Ho <riho@cisco.com>, public-ws-chor@w3.org

I've discussed this internally with my colleague Bill Eidson, and we 
think it is ok to have the choreography depend on abstract WSDL. The 
implication is that you need to have a WSDL binding to whatever message 
format and/or protocol you are using. I realize others may have 
different opinions.


Assaf Arkin wrote:

> The question is, is there any technical justification for doing 3 
> instead of 1 because at the end of the day inspite the additional layer 
> introduced by 3 it makes our job easier?
> arkin
Received on Thursday, 27 March 2003 16:16:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:00:57 UTC