W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-chor@w3.org > March 2003

Re: More about the patient/receptionist/doctor use case.

From: Francis McCabe <fgm@fla.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 10:05:15 -0800
Cc: Stephen White <swhite@SeeBeyond.com>, Ricky Ho <riho@cisco.com>, edwink@collaxa.com, jdart@tibco.com, public-ws-chor@w3.org
To: "Burdett, David" <david.burdett@commerceone.com>
Message-Id: <A9A04F70-607E-11D7-A8E3-000393A3327C@fla.fujitsu.com>


On Thursday, March 27, 2003, at 09:44  AM, Burdett, David wrote:

>
> I agree, but I think that all the variation is more due to the fact 
> that
> humans are involved who have the (non-artificial) intelligence to cope 
> with
> the variability.
>
> On the other hand I think that WS-CHOR focus will be on 
> machine-to-machine
> interaction where there is little intellligence and therefore doing the
> choreography the same way every time is actually an advantage.
>
> Thoughts?
>

Stipulated, but even in the m/c case, (perhaps especially so) you are 
going to get variability. My central issue is that the diagrams, if not 
read carefully, will be misleading.

Frank
Received on Thursday, 27 March 2003 13:08:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 December 2010 01:00:07 GMT