W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-chor@w3.org > March 2003

Re: More about the patient/receptionist/doctor use case.

From: Francis McCabe <fgm@fla.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 10:05:15 -0800
Cc: Stephen White <swhite@SeeBeyond.com>, Ricky Ho <riho@cisco.com>, edwink@collaxa.com, jdart@tibco.com, public-ws-chor@w3.org
To: "Burdett, David" <david.burdett@commerceone.com>
Message-Id: <A9A04F70-607E-11D7-A8E3-000393A3327C@fla.fujitsu.com>

On Thursday, March 27, 2003, at 09:44  AM, Burdett, David wrote:

> I agree, but I think that all the variation is more due to the fact 
> that
> humans are involved who have the (non-artificial) intelligence to cope 
> with
> the variability.
> On the other hand I think that WS-CHOR focus will be on 
> machine-to-machine
> interaction where there is little intellligence and therefore doing the
> choreography the same way every time is actually an advantage.
> Thoughts?

Stipulated, but even in the m/c case, (perhaps especially so) you are 
going to get variability. My central issue is that the diagrams, if not 
read carefully, will be misleading.

Received on Thursday, 27 March 2003 13:08:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:00:57 UTC