> > >Goland: I don't understand what the terms service composition and service semantics >mean. Could someone please define them? Monica provides a whole mess of >definitions but having 10 definitions is just as bad as having none. > >mm1: The definitions were a compilation on various types of composition from the team. We have not settled on one definition, although I have provided one below that seems appropriate here for consideration. The definitions provided span different areas of composition, and whether the team agrees they are all the same, I can not speculate on. I think it evidences the multiple levels of discussions that are occurring. Don't shoot the messenger. I would propose: **A service composition is a composition of services that results in a new service. The new service can be the combination of distinct parts to form a whole of the same generic type. The web services could be combined to achieve a specific goal.* *This integrates parts of the definitions of recursive, web service and choreography composition. > Monica >Received on Monday, 30 June 2003 17:11:53 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 December 2010 01:00:21 GMT